Brzezinski: “Its easier to kill a million people…than it is to control them” @ 7:15
Obama Adviser Brzezinskis Off-the-record Speech to British Elites
Written by William F. Jasper
Friday, 21 November 2008
Zbigniew Brzezinski, a senior adviser to President-elect Barack Obama on matters of national security and foreign policy, was the featured speaker at Chatham House in London on November 17, 2008. The title of his lecture was Major Foreign Policy Challenges for the Next US President. Although Chatham House events are known to attract the great and the good of Englands political, financial, and academic elites — as well as many of its top media representatives — there has been virtually no word as to what Brzezinski had to say in any of the worlds press.
This is but the latest example of the hermetic seal known as the Chatham House Rule, which states:
When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.
Chatham House, in St. James Square, London, is the headquarters of the powerful Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA), founded in 1920 as the principal front organization of the secret Round Table network of Cecil Rhodes, famous for his fabulous wealth from Africas gold and diamond mines. The RIIA was founded in conjunction with its sister organization in the United States, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), which is headquartered at the Pratt House in New York. Pratt House also has formally adopted the Chatham House Rule, as has the U.S. State Department (which has been dominated by CFR members for seven decades) and other U.S. agencies.
Thus, we frequently have top U.S. officials speaking privately to audiences of American and foreign elites concerning matters of great importance to the American people, but the content of those talks is off-limits to the American public. This especially should be a matter of concern if the matters these elites are discussing involve plans that will dramatically impact our society, our economy, and our political system.
Brzezinski and his friends at the RIIA and CFR assure us that nothing of the sort ever happens at these gatherings. However, I did attend one of Brzezinskis lectures at a globalist conference, where the content certainly was disturbing. It was Mikhail Gorbachevs 1995 State of the World Forum in San Francisco, and Brzezinski was one of the key speakers. He was frustrated that the new millennium was only five years away, but his long-sought goal of world government was still far off. We do not have a new world order, he told the audience, a veritable Whos Who of world finance, business, politics, media, and academia. We cannot leap into world government in one quick step, Brzezinski noted. Attaining that objective, he explained, would require a gradual process of globalization, building the new world order step by step, stone by stone through progressive regionalization.
Through his writings — as well as his policies while President Jimmy Carters national security adviser — Brzezinski has demonstrated that he is committed to the globalist world view of the RIIA/CFR and the Trilateral Commission (which he helped found, becoming its first director) rather than the constitutionalist view of our Founding Fathers. Rather than a sovereign, independent, constitutional republic, he is committed to a new world order that proposes steadily encroaching international controls and institutions, leading gradually, steadily to an America that is submerged and subsumed in a world government.
Those familiar with the writings, speeches, policies, and public records of the many public figures who attend (and speak before) these globalist gatherings understand that Brzezinskis views on these matters are not his alone; they are shared by many (if not most) of those in attendance. They are the people who set policies and determine the course our nation will take. They prattle regularly about their commitment to transparency in government. Yet they themselves speak at off-the-record gatherings such as the recent Chatham House event where Brzezinski was the featured speaker.
Is Zbigniew Brzezinski the Cause of America’s Shift Away from Israel?
From the BQI Editor’s desk
This past week President Obama made comments about the Israeli borders that set off a fire storm. Pro-Israeli Americans saw the President’s comments as a clear affirmation of his dislike for the Jewish state which implicitly feeds the other belief that the President is pro Muslim or in this case, Pro Palestinian. This latest rub comes after other actions by the President towards Israel and specifically Prime Minister Netanyahu. For example, when the PM visited the White House several months ago and the President left the PM waiting while he ate dinner with his family or the fact that he has made several trips to Europe and has yet to visit Israel. Maybe these are just instances of bad timing but most conservatives, especially, see the President’s actions as a decisive move of America away from Israel. A closer look at, again, people surrounding the President might suggest that conservatives and Israel may be reading the tea leaves correctly.
We all know about the failed presidency of Jimmy Carter. It was President Carter’s failed economic policies that brought us record high mortgage interest rates, high gasoline prices (along with long lines at the pump) and the enormously failed national security policy. Things were so bad that on the nightly news most newcasters reported on what was coined the “misery index” a compilation of economic factors that measured progress or the lack there of, of an economic recovery. But things were no better on the national security front.
President Carter and his inept foreign policy are responsible for opening the door for the Iranian Revolution; a revolution that displaced a former ally in the Shah and replaced him with the current religious fanatics in the Mullahs and now President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It was this monumental disaster of a presidency that ushered in the presidency of Ronald Reagan. So why then would a new Democrat president like Barack Obama look to failed policies or the advocate of failed policies to aid in his new administration?
Soon after being sworn into office President Obama announced Zbigniew Brzezinski as his new adviser on Middle East policy. The same Zbigniew Brzezinski who was Jimmy Carter’s National Security Adviser and proponent of a failed foreign policy. We have long seen Mr. Brzezinski as anti Israel and it appears that as early as 2008 other noted scholars could see this as well. In President Obama we are again seeing a failed foreign policy pursued by a Democrat president; however in the instant case we believe that the ramifications of Mr. Brzezinski’s and Obama’s anti-Semitic beliefs could have a devastating impact not only on Israel and the United States but the world. No one is suggesting that Mr. Brzezinski is a radical, in fact he is a well respected scholar; however, given his views and attitude towards Israel he certainly is someone who is not aligned with the majority of Americans in their support for the nation of Israel.
From here we would like to profile Mr. Brzezinski. Below is a 2008 article written by Prof. Paul Eidelberg. Professor Eidelberg is a political scientist, author and lecturer; Founder and President of Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, a Jerusalem-based think tank for improving Israel’s system of governance. He is a valued contributor to Jewish Indy. We believe that Professor Eidelberg’s description of Mr. Brzezinski is insightful and perhaps even a bit prophetic.
” … Foundation for Constitutional Democracy
I . Who is Zbigniew Brzezinski?
It was reported in the New York Sun on February 15 that Barack Hussain Obama has chosen Zbigniew Brzezinski to advise him on Middle East policy.
Back in 1985, I wrote an article on Brzezinski for The Intercollegiate Review. Before citing some of the more relevant passages of that article, it should be borne in mind that Brzezinski, a political scientist, served as President Jimmy Carter’s national security adviser. One does not have to read Carter’s Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid to know that Carter is an anti-Semite. Brzezinski has earned the same reputation.
Not only has Brzezinski publicly defended the anti-Semitic canard that the relationship between America and Israel is the result of Jewish pressure, but he also signed a letter demanding dialogue with Hamas, whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction. It behooves us to understand the mentality of Obama’s Middle East adviser—and more deeply than our so-called experts.
Long before he became Mr. Carter’s national security adviser, Brzezinski rejected what he and most political scientists term the “black-and-white” image of the American and Soviet political systems. “This image,” he says, “is held by traditional anti-Communists.” Brzezinski thus affirmed he is not quite an anti-Communist. In fact, he deplores anti-Communism as “a relic of the Cold War, of the age of ideology.”
Not only did Brzezinski reject the “black-and-white” image of the American and Soviet forms of government, he rejects the very notion of good and bad regimes! If you are shocked by Brzezinski’s moral relativism, ponder Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s confession in an interview with Ha’aretz in 2002 that his son Omri taught him “not to think in terms of black and white”—a statement uttered while suicide bombers were reducing Jews to body parts.
The influence of political scientists like Brzezinski is wide and deep. His moral relativism or neutrality prompts politicians to negotiate with and appease terrorist regimes. Mr. Obama may not be a moral relativist, but with Brzezinski as his adviser, he will be more disposed than other presidential candidates to appease Iran. Nor is this all.
With Brzezinski advising him, Obama’s chant about CHANGE may be more serious and insidious than Hillary’s silly utterances. He may have in mind changing the fundamental character of the American regime. That would fit well with the designs of one of his backers, billionaire George Soros, a globalist committed to the termination of the nation-state and the ascendancy of world government.
Since Brzezinski is a moral or historical relativism, he denies the existence of objective or transhistorical standards for determining whether the way of life of one nation, group, or individual is morally superior to that of another. (The members of the UN General Assembly would be pleased to hear this, despite the UN’s notorious record of condemning Israel without having ever condemned an Arab or Islamic terrorist state.)
Brzezinski’s relativism makes him a “weather-vane” political scientist. He urns with the winds of power; he is nothing if not “politically correct.” Working in a pluralistic and egalitarian country like America —a secular society—he conveniently adopts tolerance as his operational principle on the one hand, and equality as his primary value on the other. He is quite at home with the moral equivalency that has shaped US foreign policy toward Israel and Islamic dictatorships.
Brzezinski views history through the lens of Marxism, which, despite its atheism, has much in common with Islam. Both Communism and Islam are universalistic ideologies that reject the idea of the nation-state. Both do not regard adherence to treaties between nations as obligatory. Both Communism and Islam are militaristic and expansionist creeds that do not recognize international borders. Brzezinski’s globalism has become evident in Jimmy Carter. Under Brzezinski’s influence, Carter lowered the defense budget and pursued a soft line toward the Soviet Union. We can expect an Obama White House to pursue a very soft line toward Islam. …”
Veröffentlicht unter: general, Justitia, Mind control, N.W.O, Terrorismus, USA · Etiketten: Barack Obama, Brzezinski, CFR, Chatham House, constitutional republic, Control, Crime, Founding Fathers, globalist, Henry Kissinger, Illuminati, Its easier to kill a million people, Marxism, Mikhail Gorbachev, Murder, NWO, Population, Reptilian, RIIA, Royal Institute of International Affairs, security adviser, The Awakening, Trilateral Commission, universalistic ideologies, War, William F. Jasper